[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

Home
Cats Cat Breeds A-H
Cat Breeds J-P
Cat Breeds R-Y
Unusual Breeds A-E
Unusual Breeds K-U
Wild Cat Species 1
Wild Cat Species 2
Competition Competition
Maps Rescue USA Mapped
Rescue UK Mapped
Animal Rescue AUS
Tiger Reserves Map
American Zoos Map
Cat Boarding UK Map
Info Cat Health Problems
Breeds Categorized
Rare Cat Breeds
Domestic Cat Size
Cat and Law
Understand Behavior
Cat Guardianship
Cat History
Domestic Cat History
Cat Sounds
Feral Cats
Cat Food
Cat Facts/Opinion
Cat Anatomy
Declawing Cats
Elisa's Articles
Speak Your Mind
Cat News
Cartoon Cats
Pictures of Cats
Warrior Cats
Giving to Cats
POC Updates
PoC Admin
Helmi Flick Photo

Protect Constitutional Property Rights of Animal Owners

Stray Cat - photo by paolo màrgari

Stray Cat - photo by paolo màrgari

There is a website called www.change.org, which has a post by someone who declares that in America there is a need to protect property rights of animal owners.

He argues that these rights are being eroded by HSUS at other animal welfare organizations. He argues that HSUS is driven by a desire to break the human/animal bond.

Well, I have to strongly disagree. And I disagree with the title he gave his article. The idea of "property rights" over animals give us a strong clue as to the kind of person he is. The phrase, "property rights" indicates that we have rights over animals as if they are "property" in a legal sense (i.e. inanimate objects). There has to be a difference between companion animals and farm livestock, surely? It could be argued that we own livestock. Livestock are bred for commercial gain and food etc.

But, it seems to me that we can never treat companion animals as if we own them; we live with them. We are or should be equal to them. Yes, under the law we do own our cats but under commonsense and decency we live with domestic cats and that is the only arrangement and mentality that can work.

So, the idea of constitutional property rights in animal owners is the kind of mentality that HSUS rejects in the interest of the animal as it can breed contempt for the animal.It fosters the potential for lack of respect for fellow creatures. It places us above all animals and this engenders the wrong attitude, one in which we are liable to hurt animals and use and abuse them.

People will find HSUS difficult because arrogant human is blind to his arrogance and ignorance. Don't get me wrong though, HSUS are not necessarily perfect but they are a voice for animals that have no voice and they are organized.

It seems the world is divided on the concept of animal welfare. But as long as a person thinks he/she has constitutional property rights over animals and owns companion animals there will be a need for HSUS to correct the balance and protect animals.

Picture published under license --

From protect constitutional property rights of animal owners to Home Page

Click here to post comments.

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Forum
.